Re: fifodir interface

From: Laurent Bercot <ska-skaware_at_skarnet.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 19:09:52 +0100

On 17/03/2016 18:33, Buck Evan wrote:
> Reading the code, however (in ftrigw_notifyb_nosig), it shows that it only
> writes to named pipes with a certain prefix (ftrigw1) and of a certain
> length (49).
>
> Can we change the implementation to match the doc?
> In other words, can we please remove the restrictions on fifodir pipe names?

  Good catch ! But I'd rather update the doc to match the current behaviour. The
current behaviour is actually safer.
  Do you have a specific reason to need arbitrary pipe names ?

-- 
  Laurent
Received on Thu Mar 17 2016 - 18:09:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 09 2021 - 19:38:49 UTC