On 22/08/2016 14:02, Casper Ti. Vector wrote:
> Are SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 not just silently ignored in -S mode?
Uuuuh, yes, my bad, they are.
Sigh. I'm not sure what the right thing even is. Should they be ignored
in -S mode? Should they do something? ISTR I kept them ignored *precisely*
to avoid hardcoding policy into s6-svscan; it should probably remain that way.
--
Laurent
Received on Mon Aug 22 2016 - 13:35:02 UTC