>You seem to have mis-spelled "works". (-: The program has made the
>system calls that you told it to, and they have succeeded, setting the
>soft limit that you instructed.
Indeed, there's nothing in that strace that points to a dysfunction
in s6-softlimit. (But it's an excellent illustration of why Linux users
should switch from glibc to musl. :))
Jan, do you have any more evidence pointing at s6-softlimit as the
culprit
in your issue?
--
Laurent
Received on Tue Nov 29 2016 - 10:14:18 UTC